There is no mystery here. Never was. It’s simply just a matter of the media at large taking advantage of the hotels rather ghoulish reputation. I’ve seen people acting the way Ms Lam does in the cctv footage and it’s simply down to mental illness.
Here are just a few reasons to question this case’s official ruling: The elevator footage released to the media and public 1/ Why was the timecode scrambled? 2/ Why was the video slowed down? This has been proven by superimposing actual real-time timecode against the released video’s scrambled timecode 3/ Why include the lengthy latter part of the video after she leaves the picture? 4/ If she “found her way onto the roof”, then why not show the surveillance camera footage showing this? There are cameras pointing to the fire escapes and the stairs going to the rooftop access (the one with the alarmed door). This footage would be proof that she went up there alone. Instead, a doctored video was released, very conveniently painting the picture that she went on a solo psychotic episode. 5/ There are countless accounts of foul play originating in that hotel. It’s criminal-ridden. Shady characters actually live there. 6/ There are also countless accounts from social media and hotel reviews of former hotel guests, of being stalked, messed with (noises, knocks on their door but no one with there), even watched in the bathroom, by unknown individuals 7/ Why was the autopsy report changed from “unknown” to “accidental”? 8/ Supposedly, Elisa was acting strange according to roommates in her initial room, which is why she was put in her own room. Where is their deposition? Was this verified information or a story made up to match the “she was acting crazy” explanation? 9/ Why did the police dogs not pick up Elisa’s scent around the water tanks? Why did the police not get fingerprint evidence from the water tank ladder? There’s no reason to scramble the timecode, unless there’s something to hide. There’s no reason to slow down the video, and include useless footage of an empty elevator going down the floors. There’s no reason to omit footage of her using the fire escape or the roof stairs (and yes, there are/were cameras there at the time). No reason for all of this – UNLESS some people are trying to paint a particular story, in order to cover up foul play. Speak to any former guest at that hotel and I bet a large majority of them will pick foul play over accident if they had to guess. The above questions aren’t about paranormal activity, ghosts, etc.. They are legitimate questions based on unbiased, hard facts (unless proven otherwise), and they all point to a clear deduction: that there was a cover-up.